>>37316836>pikachu already has a good moveset so it is excusable no further reserch was made.No, this is retarded. What if Pikachu had a better moveset that could have pushed it further up the list? Do you really think it's excusable to just stop at the first thing that "works"?
>this is NOT a link to forum.Whoops. My bad. Here it is.
https://www.smogon.com/forums/threads/dustox.3545955/Also is a screenshot to further BTFO of you in case I fuck up again.
So, given this definitive proof that this text was here at the very least since 2015, and the fact that Dustox was actually released in generation III with Ruby/Sapphire, meaning that people were most likely experimenting with Wurmple strats since 2003, I think this puts your ass at full retard mode, making these:
>fact is, it only had an example set last i checked it.>if smogon did explore other sets for dustox traces would have been left in the forums or with replays. absence of such traces IS evidance no research was made.Hilarious. What you SHOULD have done the second I mentioned the link was to instead do some research on your own to see if you could find my proper link and attack that, but instead you posted out of your ass and now look the fool. I don't even feel good about destroying you this bad because it was just frankly too easy.
But let's keep going:
>hurr absence of evidance'.Look, just because you put "hurr" in front of it doesn't make it inaccurate, as we can all plainly see by the fact you just got absolutely destroyed for ignoring it. In fact, you were very adamant that this "does PROVE"[sic], so I think what you need to do is return to the drawing board and adjust your thought process and the idea that you're "logical", cause you're just going to wind up being hurt again.
>>37316953If it comes down to a website that dedicates themselves to the art of competitive Pokémon, and a retard who lied about checking the site recently, I think I'm going to believe them over you.
