>>40499069It is both literally and objectively true, anon.
>>40499447By your example, imagine we have a shooter series, known for having a fuckton of guns and every game gets more guns, then all of a sudden in game 8, they decide "huh, that's too many guns" and cut, say, 20% of them, completely at random, removing some fan favorites while keeping in some shitty guns that literally nobody uses. People throw a fit, they're willing to pay money for DLC to unlock the missing guns, but nope, the company just puts out a PR-approved statement saying something like "please understand" and adding Overwatch-style ultimates to make up for missing weapon attachments.
