Quoted By:
Notes on Gen 6 decisions:
>VERY few new lines here, but what we got is quite strong
>mediocre starter line-up, but Greninja's tongue scarf is too creative not to enjoy
>banchou panda is great
>the only good cat in the entire fucking series
>somehow a sword + shield Pokemon, a retarded concept, is really well-designed
>FINALLY A FUCKING T-REX
>awesome sound dragon
>fuck pink blobs
>Binacle what the fuck yo
>worst pseudo ever
>why the FUCK is Klefki part Fairy? The whole "animate object that resembles a typical inanimate object" thing was the domain of Ghosts since Gen 3 with Banette. Even in this very fucking gen, you have Aegislash holding to this pattern. What makes Klefki Fairy?
>much like Fairy in the type chart, Sylveon does not make sense in the Eevee line. It does not fit in design-wise, standing out much too hard.
FINAL THOUGHTS:
Gens 4 and 6 seemingly have the best designs in all, but 4 is given an unfair advantage with most of its designs being built off already-existing ones. Improvement is easier than creation. And Gen 6 would be FAR worse, had I included Mega-Evolutions, which are largely terrible.
Gens 2 and 3 stand at the front of the pack for good versus bad, while Gen 5 actually has the most good designs, but is extremely polarizing, likely contributing to the hate force and defense force of Gen 5 on this board. Gen 1 has many solid, iconic designs, but is also laden with shitty, lazy, filler 'Mons.
