>>33179998Have you considered that a being of infinite scope would not even be understandable by humans? It goes beyond anything we can understand.
>>33180639If you want to start bullshit like that then you have to discuss that children did not used to be known as boy or girl, all children were called by the same term of daughter. As language developed the male children (they did know he differences it's not tranny shit, same way you say child today) became known as boys. Boy is a term that was used for slaves. As such our language calls all men slaves and all women children. Really makes ya think huh?
>>33183177:^)