>>18753640Why is there confusion? The rules are fucking objective.
There should NEVER be any confusion about who the champ is, and if there is, it's because people reacting don't know what they're talking about.
>>18753512This anon responded to the "new champ" with a trip. They were very clearly intending to be champ. No rule says they need to include "me". The only reason anyone would ignore this is because they want snills to be champ instead.
