>>16595825now what if GF retconned jynx into being dark/ice because they originally had her be a racist caricature? that'd make me uncomfortable too because it's just, not right. when you have a pokemon thats supposed to represent gay people be typed with a term used to describe gay people (in a negative light, mind you), it just doesnt seem right. when handling sensitive issues you dont just go for broke and make a political cartoon, especially not when dealing with whats supposed to be a childrens game.
>>16595847basically
>>16594569yes sortof! Idk, I always thought the idea of reverse dimorphism in animals to be interesting for pokemon, especially since it's a very common phenomenae. (pic related, it's sort of how I'd go about it with respects to mosquitos, since they're the go-to example of it)
