>>55013608>Anon, that's admitting that you cannot in fact see every feature clearly because of the blurring and everything else.No, not at all. What the fuck is wrong with your head? The argument being made is that the features on the creature within the photograph are all clearly visible. The problem is that these clearly visible features are inconsistent with the features on Great Tusk. You're falling back on circular logic again trying to cope your way out of those. No, the features being inconsistent does not mean that the features on the photograph are obscured. It means the features on the photograph are different.
