>>44521064>Everybody universally hates those designs because theyre too human and have flesh clothing and shit. Meanwhile, Greninja, Cinderace, Lucario and Decidueye are well liked which goes against your narrative. The point wasn’t about whether they were popular or not, it was about the archetype always existing in the series, jackass.
>This isnt fucking dnd and using dnd lore to validate stupid pokemon designs is beyond autistic.The point is that humanoid monsters have always been a thing in fantasy worlds. They don’t just go away because it triggers your autism, retard. You were the first one to mention DnD anyways you retarded fuck. And don’t even pretend that your deranged screeching about furfags is valid justification against them.
>Theyre literally always designed in a way thats obviously trying to appeal to kids or child-like adults.Fursuits and fursonas are custom, dumbshit, they’re meant to appeal to the person that made them. It possibly appealing to anyone else is a side effect. Pokemon are designed to appeal to broad audiences around the world, but apparently you’re too brain dead to see that BLATANTLY obvious difference.
>Im not going to waste time explaining why thats a fucking retarded point.It’s a joke, autist. I mentioned that ironically and you sperged out about it instead. Nice job autismo.
>Did I say to get rid of all the non-savage pokemon? Jackass, that’s not the point, you were saying certain designs were okay because they were “savage” when the actual point I was trying to get through your thick skull was that designing something “savage” isn’t fucking necessary just because (You) say so. Dumb fuck.
>hire talented people from the community to make pokemon good again. The creature designs aren’t what made this series bad you delusional tunnel visioning fuck. Changing the creature designs won’t fix the dumbed down experience, the shit textures, the shit story, shit characters and shit world design.
