>>26644675Holy fucking shit the backpedaling here is ridiculous.
You literally said the artist had "deviantart-tier" style. That's not critique, that's just saying "it's shit". Critique would be pointing out what they did wrong and what can be done to improve it. Not "it's shit".
Not once did I suggest that you needed to be better than the artist to criticize them. That's stupid.
What I am saying is that you said "I'm an artfag and the fact that nobody recognized how OBVIOUSLY FAKE these were is retarded!" That's great you're an artfag, but it had nothing to do with your (shitty) arguments.
You're an artfag? Okay, show us what makes this pose impossible. Highlighting shit with a colord square tells us nothing.
None of the details you pointed out were correct. I meticulously outlined why every single one of them were wrong or irrelevant.
You went from "lol these fakes are SOOOO OBVIOUS you dumb faggots!" to "hey man i'm still learning i'm just giving criticism man". I don't give a shit about your life story, I give a shit about your shitty argument.
How many fucking times do I have to tell you that I do not believe any current leaks are real?
