>>50640469>This has roughly zero reference to current conversation. Yes it does. You're here talking about nuance and trickery and how it fits Gengar, but ironically this never was how Gengar was intended to be. Gengar is portrayed as spamming Shadow Ball, and that's its entire identity. But I expected too much from you.
>Kill yourself splittranny.Already going a buzzwords. Are you perhaps a crossboarder? Well, I should give you a name too, let's say retard-kun, because you're this thread's clown.
Perhaps it is because age has made you senile, but your "argument" was entirely nonsensical.
