>>53225958Cont.
This probably wouldn't reach character limit, but I needed more time.
>>53224709>How dedicated a trainer must be to evolve their Pokémon?This is actually a doubt I had before. My OC has a team of fully evolved Pokémon, but his characterization is that he doesn't like battling and unless his Pokémon *want* to battle when he's challenged, he himself would rather avoid it, which got me thinking: Pokémon that evolve by level, would only evolve through battle if in a real life(ish) scenario?
Yes, answered with another question.
>HealthcareConsidering that the Pokémon world is portrayed as pretty utopic more often than not, I'd say it's totally free.
>discovery of Fairy typesLet's see:
>Be me>Sitting next to a clearing in some random forest while my Pokémon play or eat together>Suddenly, a mail Tranquill shows up and deliver me a newsletter (One Piece style)>The newsletter states that a new type was discovered, the Fairy type>"wtf.jpeg">Attached, there's a list of Pokémon discovered to be Fairy types>"Hime (Mawile) look, it seems you are a Fairy type now.">"Waaaait, you immune to dragon now?! Just because a scientist said so?">Mawile: *confused Mawile noises*>"I've decided, I'll become a scientist, and make you immune to EVERYTHING! Mwahahahahaha!". . .
Extended joke aside, my opinion is the same as
>>53224765, in games where Fairy type exists, it always existed.
. . .
How wrong I was... this one alone already reached character limit, so the last answer will be in the next post.
