>>44781241>You keep saying I don't readI keep saying you don't understand, not that you don't read. As shown by you failing to understand that despite me literally directly stating such multiple times
See
>>44780652"you can read but you fail at comprehension." and you continue to fail at comprehension.'
>Alain is somehow related to not understanding literatureAlain is a simple character. characters in literature are complex. If you're filtered by a simple character you'd be filtered by complex characters. As you've proven over and over.
>Because you're defending an irredeemable character and failing at it.Actually I'd consider myself succeeding since your defense eroded to
>"fuck off with being smart, your character is bad because I said so!"Which isn't much of a defense at all.
