>>40109512>it doesn't have to "play more attackers", just have to play more attackersI don't even need to read the rest, really.
>ygo as an example of balanceYou can't even follow your own posts? It's an example of a meta that is not stale. Look at this metagame report from last month. Aside form the 9 relevant decks, there is maybe other 9 in the "others", which are decks that won a significant tournament. I would love for you to name 18 viable pokemon decks right now, note that some of the shards, like the dragon links includes every variant of the deck.
>makes weaker cards fundamentally weakerReshizard would get shit on by some water pokemon that both deals double and resists it, so it would have to play either a grass or electric that counters it, but by doing so, it fundamentally leaves itself open to be countered by other decks, since it would have to switch support around, and maybe consider not running 4x reshizard. Without to mention that switching in and out would now a much more interesting mechanic.
>anything other than the 8~10 best one-off techsWe currently doesn't even have that many one-off techs. The only techs people use in multiple decks are Dedenne and Tapu lele.
