>>46818699Well, they do know their base after all, I can't disagree or even say that I "dislike" it. I just wish they would pay attention to every aspect of it than what easily sells.
>>46818706Some of us actually like what actual women have to offer anon, than just some stereotyped image. Her design is fine, it's really the direction of the character that hurt her like it did most things in X/Y. But of course, depth doesn't matter, I should just coom & get over it right?
