>>56129329>Headcanon is a word used in film/television/comics/etc. fandom that refers to something a fan imagines about the characters (such as a scenario or relationship) but that doesn't appear on screen/on the page.So the very fact Game Freak spent company time, project funds and staff effort to add this to their games proves it's not "headcanon" because the creators are the ones pushing it. Go back to school if you can't comprehend simple english, it's clear you haven't even the comprehension level of Pokémon's target market, let alone a full-grown adult.
>>56129902It's not meant to, or rather it's irrelevant to how they wish to present to the world. We already have nulltards claiming because the daycare staff say to the protags (who are all pre-teen children) "oh, we don't know how the egg got here", pokémon don't sexually reproduce, despite the only way to get an egg being put a male and female or a male/female and the canon mimic of indeterminate gender pair into the daycare. Never mind the blurb they attendant would say to kids being an oblique hint to how sexually interested the pair were with each other ("it's more interested in playing with other pokémon" - they not gonna fuck dude/"the two get along rather well!" - they be fucking like rabbits mang). Do you honestly think they WANT to explain how a freshly-hatched Kangaskhan gets a baby? No. But Tajiri didn't want to put a kangaroomon into his game series, without at least displaying it was a kangaroo by detailing its pouch. The fact they went and made it an exclusively female species shows they at least were thinking several steps ahead (as they'd tried to add breeding and genders to Gen 1 and had to shelve it). Remember, pokémon obliterate the laws of our natural world just by existing. Thus applying our real-world laws to their universe is not only folly, but shows how autistic you are, by insisting it MUST be the same as the real world. When dogs learn to spit fire, you'll have a point.
