>>38322067they don't exist, nobody likes the gen 1 games, they're a broken mess.
what you mean is kanto fans exist. if you weren't such a brainlet you'd be able to make that distinction.
>>38322086>Let me dumb it down for you.no let me dumb it down for you. you used '10 to 2' as an example of a higher ratio of good to bad. if there's 10 pokemon and only 2 good designs then that isn't a higher ratio at all you absolute single digit IQ pleb. 8-9 out of 10 works, and that directly links to what kalos is ratio wise in terms of good designs
unova on the other hand would be 2 out of 10
don't argue math when you clearly lack the education to be able to handle simple number patterns.
>>38322097t. seething unovabortion
>>38322100there is, it's called the gen 5 audience of toddler minded manchildren.
>>38322102>you can not say something is objectively good or bad, those are subjective words, just because you don't like the gen 5 designs doesn't mean they are factually badyou quite literally can say something is objectively good or bad.
>just because you don't like the gen 5 designs doesn't mean they are factually badno, they actually are factually bad in every sense of the word.
