>>12042551Why do your surveys only get 100 votes, they should be open longer. Normal surveys have around 150 votes so your surveys are missing out on 1/3rd of the community. Which is a pretty big chunk.
Also how do we know you don't change votes since you are always just anon? We have had problems in the past with anons making surveys and messing with the votes. It seems like whenever someone was wondering something about a Pokemon or giving feedback about what they didn't like about one you would reply to their post telling them to vote for a culling/probation survey. Isn't that a little biased?
Also as this person has said
>>12043062Adding new Pokemon into the Dex would only make this whole progress longer in which we have already ruled out adding any other Pokemon. Isn't the point of this to make things run faster and close up redesign process faster? That sounds like it would just make it all longer. Also a few other things in the newest survey is going against rules that have already been decided on in the past.
Plus since SM only lets you take 100 votes at a time and your two results pages that I have seen one being 100 the other being 99, are you checking for duplicate votes? Since these surveys would be the one if any that people would try to cheat. And then bringing back up the case if we can trust you, since you have been surveying things that have already been decided on and are always posting as anon. Can I make a survey that says to completely disregard your surveys and make it so it has 100 votes saying yes 0 saying no.
If we are to have a survey to decide on Probation/culling what ever it should be done on Dunky's account so we can have the whole community of this project apart of it not just 2/3rds if that. Plus it should be done by someone official not some random anon since this would be such a big decision. Plus it was already voted on that we would not have a culling survey awhile back.
