>>42112738The ability to cobble together sentences, yet no ability to grasp what they mean: sophistry at its finest. Literally every word in this post stems from a total misunderstanding, below the subject matter, of how arguments even work.
For instance, the first point. Anon states that the lengthy development time for Gen 1 is relevant to the discussion about those games being the first and roughest draft in an experimental series. I point out that this fine, since, y'know, it's the very first, so of course it takes more time to develop a completely new formula, while the ones that come after need less time to merely revisit it in tiny iterations that often move backwards as much as forwards. Anon responds to this argument by ... saying that I have no argument. Anon responds to an argument by insisting that it does not exist, and leaves it at that. Marvelous.
The rest of the analysis is exactly like this. Christmas shitposting at its finest.
