>>51775720Deflection to Gen 5 when it wasn't brought up is a dishonest reaction to criticism of Gen 6. I'm sorry you're a colossal retard and can't comprehend that, or you're lying and pretending that it's somehow a valid defense of Gen 6's issues to suddenly divert all discussion to Gen 5's issues instead. For your second point greater context depends entirely on the topic at hand, the only topic at hand is me explaining that sperms almost exclusively argue in bad faith. It would be up to you to provide a topic, not for me to provide context for every argument ever made on the subject of Gen 6. Me pointing out that you blatantly strawmanned my statement is not a bad faith argument, it's me pointing out that you strawmanned me. But since you've now made it abundantly clear you're either a retard or a troll, have your last (You) from me.
