>>38586368There's undoubtably a margin of error that becomes especially prominent among niche pokemon because if they're niche and get little to no art in the first place, yet still manage to get that one autist that draws a shitton of lewds, like the Rotomfag, then yes, it will be skewed.
But the case is that its an accurate way of measuring furryness in the case of actual popular, non-niche pokemon where a single person doesn't influence the results nearly as much and helps determine how much of the fanbase is in it for the porn. It's kinda like having 2 bowls of Skittles and being forced to eat a handful from each bowl despite both bowls containing some poisoned Skittles mixed in between. If one of the bowls had 10,000 skittles in total and 400 of them were poisoned, while the other had 1,000 total Skittles and 100 poisoned skittles, would you still think the first bowl is more "dangerous" just because it has a higher amount of total poisoned skittles?
