>>29580599I'd say there's a disparity when it comes to what pokemon you're masturbating to. A pokemon based on some manner of existing animal? Yeah, that's furry. Literally any other pokemon most likely falls under xenophilia considering there's no real life analogues, and a major focus on the more bizarre physiological aspects of the subject in question. Arguably less degenerate considering it's pure fantasy. And like
>>29580775 said, considering most if not all pokemon are sapient to some degree.
