>>26545809>>26545752Okay, I think I totally get what you're saying. It's a little odd, but I can grasp how it works.
I think the argument people are making here is that the idea that something like the given examples WOULDN'T cause any sort of bodily harm is a bit silly, in any format.
I also think the beheading analogy threw us off a bit by not really connecting HP loss with head loss quite right. What is the HP of the beheaded guy? If that guy lost his head and all of his HP to a hit, why would Pidgey not be obliterated and lose all its HP to a laser blast? I think that's a big part of the concern here.
>>26545868See, I'm 97% sure that this guy has the right idea out of all this and the whole "abstract concept" thing is just a bit of overthinking.
