>>29681639>I said 'aesthetical' isn't a word, not aestheticProvided link was about aesthetical. Learn to read.
>Yes, as explained to you countless timesYou denied that in pic related
>Incomprehensible nonsense showcasing your refusal to understand an explanation isn't an argument.nigga, if you don't understand my argument(as you said when you mentioned "incomprehensible gibberish", but you probably wont take responsibility for this) at least don't accuse me for not understanding anything on the very same sentence.
To put it in layman's terms: your argument hinges on shonen not being the only thing aimed at boys yet you pointed out things that are either shonen(going by wikipedia, source that you cited, so you have to take charge for what it says) or not aimed at boys at all.
>It's notYou literally said it was published SHOUNEN ace, are you really gonna say the entire industry is wrong on their labeld but you're right?
>no, shounen in the sense that it's being discussed here is a genreShonen is demographic. If some westerns like to change the definition then fine, but doesnt make it more correct than the one made in the fucking country of origin. Also, if you realy think this, you should have pointed that out earlier in the discussion.
>If you're in JapanAKA the country the ashnime, and shonen magazines are from.
>no, they're not.YOu cited wikipedia and wikipedia says they're shonen with the only arguable exception being Code Geass.
>you have done no such thingYou mean your own contradictoy arguments, external links and links to one of your sources that contradicts your own points?
>this entire thread is proof, it's already been posted.Nice way of dodging it.
1/2
