>>19866290Yeah I don't know if they're intended to be points on the backs of the legs or edges. Looking at some of the old art in the dropbox it looks like the latter but I can't be sure. Also some of the old art has both back legs looking like the way it was done in
>>19866182 with the double-points instead of them looking like the front legs.
The art that was on its wiki page before (pic related) looks like it has both back legs drawn different ways - the close one with the double-points and the far one drawn with the longer, single point. Should both back legs use the double-points?
>>19866670>>19866834I see what you mean and I'll work on a version with some fixes.
