>>53283761No anon. It's bad for manchildren who grew up thinking they were always going to be A-Number Onee target demographic, like they thought they were when they initially got exposed to it.
As mentioned several thousand people pissed over less optimised games than what they're used to is not really basis for anything, much less calling a game the worst of all time, when despite its lack of optimiasation, it's still sold far faster than any Nintendo game ever, alsmot as if the people who wwant to bu it don' judge a game on one part, but take its reception as an overall (something taking the mean of review scores ignore that many people knock off points because "whaa, muh oppyemisters", yet go on to say it's the best pokémon game in series' history (because they're not judging it vs their childhood ideal of the first pokémon game they ever played, like you).
They are developing the games how they wish - they haven't shown one bit of desire to make anything BUT the same copypasted game endlessly, because Tajiri's whole push to make it was making a game kids could play creature collector, as he'd played creepy-crawlie collector. That it's still an entry-level, kiddy rpg just proves they're perfectly happy with their workload or rather, Tajiri's happy keeping it as so. That it feeds into what Nintendo view it as and what TPC do with it just further hammers home that take.