Quoted By:
I'm obsessed with categorizing stuff (Even though this one is a sloppy mess because of the volume and sleepyness) So I did this for some unholy reason. Even if you have some qualms about individual placements there are clear general trends.
>Beautiful mons are made the least. (This may change when more recent gens are taken into account.)
>Simple and cute mons are surprisingly low, but that's to be expected because many mons have cute first forms but change into another category later.
>The largest category is what would normally be very niche mons, which is more evidence of japan's good taste. This might change in recent gens but probably not.
>In general the quintrants are very close together, which can be evidence that this is something that GF thinks around and balances the design distribution around. This makes sense because they'd want to appeal to the widest audience possible.
>Many mythicals being cute balances out for how many legendaries are kaijumon. So both people who appreciate manly mons and people who appreciate cute mons can have access to the most powerful pokemon in the game.
>On that same note not that many weird legendaries in early gens even though they make a bulk of the regular mons.
>I wonder who are the bigger virgins, waifufags or weirdmonfags? Those who seek a replacement for 3D women or those who are naturally drawn to the unlikely, unpopular underdogs.
>Every category has at least one very popular mon
>I put Kyogre in waifumon category for some reason
Is there one of these that has all pokemon or at least 8th gen pokemon?