>>36307372>if LGPE weren't pure kanto panderingIf it weren't, there are at least two outcome I can think of, and both are preferable to what we're getting.
>Still pander to Kanto, but in a way it doesn't consume the entire gameWhich is pretty much SM/USUM, so your point is proven, I suppose.
Provided you ignore the fact that I don't like the game, just the mons.>Pure pandering to other regionI mean, come on. Johto, Hoenn, Sinnoh, et al exists too.
Bottom line is, yes, I will defend LGPE if it wasn't pure Kanto pandering.
