>>56508951the logical leap from "its a carnival dancing duck" to "its a fighting type" includes the step "it kicks, which is a dancing move, and also a fighting technique" which is neither intuitive nor apparent in the design even if you know its theme
i know what you are trying to say, but it doesnt work; part of the issue isnt that you can see what they were going for after its explained in a magazine interview, but that the designs have multiple interpretable type themes
