>>32766522Not ideal, yeah. Decidueye's main design is very cartoony in terms of feathering and wing physics. I appreciate that the smaller, detail feathers are limited to the coverts, head plume, and body plumage, whereas the individual wing feathers just have lots of little lines that could arguably represent vanes and barbs and such. Still, if they'd put a subtle central shaft on each of the flight feathers (like you can see on the hood feather) it would've made it more clear that they aren't just rubbery flaps made of multiple feathers. I'm a huge fan of Decidueye overall, but realism and believable physics are not its strong suit.
