>>50330686Oh. So was it bad for me to have the Name Rater say this if you tried getting him to change the name of a Shadow Pokemon in a game without Shadow Pokemon(who the fuck uses debug features to check for something like that just in case)?
>>50322074More than once I have thought about removing redundant types, and adding better ones.
Anything can be a Light Creature or Darkness Creature or Fire Creature.
But what can be a Dragon, a Bug, or a Bunny?
Splitting Water type into Aquatic Creature type, Ocean type, and Fish type would be stupid. Creating a Bunny type would be stupid too.
But a mole can be any type. Rock or Ground. Without even needing to be part rock or dirt or a burrowing creature or gemstone themed.
