>>38586495>>38586503I pulled it out from a list in
>>38584305 so i didn't have to do it myself. Now that that's settled, why do you keep dodging the point that you're obviously a raging furfaggot and thinking anecdotal evidence is somehow meaningful in an argument? I can already imagine you in court:
>Yes, it is true that i had a huge stash of cheese pizza in my desk, but can we instead focus on the fact that the investigators actually saw the pics and brought them to court as evidence? They must be some real sickos, eh? 