>>39436134>None of those animals are very close to the shape and form of a human whatsoever1) You said human like all those I listed fit the bill 2) A Sloth and Bear are actually incredibly close to human first as a close relative and in the latter case its the anatomy and the fact Bear often walk bipedally on plantigrade feet, upright like a human which is actually even closer in stance then our closer relative the gorilla so your definition blows as it still can be applied to totally feral animals
>you prone to getting into lengthy arguments about pointless bullshit on this siteAre you? You don't need to keep answering.
>Because I feel like I've seen you around in these threads, and if I have then I'm going to call it here because we're going to get absolutely nowhereLast thread I had a debate in was the Fox Friday thread, compared Zoroark to a Tanuki where the other guy compared it to a Kitsune. IF that helps.
