>>28131315Everything wrong with this image:
>Representing only gen 1 Pokemon. For someone who wants to be properly represented, that's Gerenationist. >Not using the superior "gender chart" as seen here >>28131402>Here's a multi part, so bear with me. The Phrase "you took the time to learn 150+ of these." You say 150+ like you put no research into what you are even talking about. For all you know, you could be talking about Magical vending machines.>Next, nobody took the time to learn every pokemon's name. It happens by PLAYING THE FUCKING GAME. I could say the same thing about you knowing the lyrics to Justin Bieber's songs or some random bullshit, but not knowing what beer I enjoy, but I don't because I'm sane.>"It won't kill you to learn more than two of these." Maybe not physically, but people have moral beliefs and then there's the issue of limited memory. I could memorize your fairytale snowflake genders, or I could save that for the names of my children and the stories they are bound to tell me. Hmmm... HMMMMMM.... Geee. It's like Sophie's choice all over again.THere's probably more to be found, so other anons feel free to add on. This b8 thread needs some fun to it, and OP should feel like a fag for posting such garbage. Also, pic is always related.
