>>49593152Its exactly as you say, I asked around and was told it was through datamining. I was even told that the number was completely randomly drawn out from a value of 1 to 256 which I can believe now for the old list, sure, but for those new numbers would be absolutely ridiculous unless there was a way to unlock it somehow.
>>49593183Another coincidence, that's another Pokemon out of the three singular Pokemon I've managed to get its smallest size according to the old list together with Zoroark and Lucario, and it again was extremely difficult to find. I would absolutely kill for a Sneasler that size, but maybe these super low numbers are just gonna be distributed through dlc or some shit later down the line and are not actually accessible right now.
