>>58344184I'd also be in disbelief if I didn't see it happen.
>>58344219A bit, people throw it around like it applies for everything, but to me the general message is more "individuals have more control over the atmosphere of a social space than they think". In this case, if they allow clover, they run the risk of being labelled as a "hateful website" and attracting people who would actually break their rules. They'd have to more effectively moderate the kinds of people/behaviors/etc they allow, which seeing their current performance of rage quitting, general uncohesiveness, and unclear messaging, I really doubt they can. Banning clover and silencing everyone about it is significantly safer and easier, so I'm sure that's what's going to happen.
