Quoted By:
Here we post things that there are Pokemon based on, but shouldn't have had.
>koala
Starting off with the obvious one. Koalas are literally the worst mammals on earth: They ONLY eat eucalyptus, which is really tough to chew and hard to digest, and the babies have to eat their mothers' poop since they can't digest eucalyptus poison yet. Plus they can only identify food if it comes straight from the tree, they do not eat eucalyptus on a plate. Literal retards of animals.
>kangaroos
They steal things everytime and like to show off as tough badasses, but when you punch them in their ugly faces, they stand still like "I didndu nufin!". The niggers of the bush. I would squish their stupid pink jelly babies if i had the opportunity.
>pelicans
They're so ugly, noisy, smelly, annoying, and useless. Why are these hideous creatures in a game for children? If pigeons are the rats of the sky, then pelicans are the rats of the sea. The contribute to literally NOTHING. They only pollute. All pelicans should die. Storks were already bad enough, why do we have to have storks with sacks in their beaks?
>echidnas
Well, at least this one is only the first stage of the line, but why did it have to be a starter? Just for Knuckles fanboys? And badgers aren't even that great either.
What kid actually knows what an echidna is? It makes no sense for one to be a Pokemon that's going to be marketed to infinity and beyond.
