>>29475866> >we know it's this, but it is ugly because of this What are you saying? It's nonsense.I'm saying that the way the cat is presented does express what it's supposed to be. However I don't like the way it looks.
> Anything you consider 'ugly' is a product of you misreading tropes from the design as ideas about proportions you've picked up from drawfag threadsAnything I consider ugly is what I consider ugly as
>>29474854 says.
Actually, if you go back trough the conversation, the whole time I was trying to tell you I find it ugly.
That's it. Too bad you were preoccupied with being on your high horse of "I'm objective about the subjective topic of whether you should like how something looks" to get something this simple.
The biggest irony is that I'm supposed to be with the "4chan perspective" here, even though you're being a fucking elitist
