>>14974831Sadly no. A lot of it is just us having been there for most of it. I suggest making a wiki page of proposed side quests and a thread on the forum as it'd be easier for people to see, see the validity of the suggestions and that they're there, and make it easier for the surveyors to collect everything
>>14974953Speaking of which, we really need to consider what we are going to do about dungeons and the like ingame. Shit, we don't even have a proposed location for the lost city yet. It's still all headcanon
>>14974975This is what it would probably look like. Focus on the hill
