>>53959566>so that companies can literally sell low effort low cost shit and people buying it because they have to and the company getting praised for it, while the investors get their money back from the sales thus getting richer and more influential.>You naturally have plants and shills in communities as well who spam about how whatever company xyz did, was correct and can't be criticized.And now remember about how the last two gens have shipped and how people defended the games with the
>"but its on a new console">"they're going to patch it out">"wow i can't wait for the dlc">"it's fine if the pokemon only have generic animations for attacks, it was always like this. You can't expect such a small company to actually do work"Pokemon was already a low effort re-skin of older games, but video games in general have been releasing in atrocious states and this should tell you everything.
Ah well, it's not anyone gives an actual fuck about the shit they eat.