>>40049496>THE GRAPHICS OF IN THIS GAME ARE UNACCEPTABLE!!It's an objective improvement from gen 7 and should be treated as such
>WHAT ABOUT HAVING REUSED MODELS??!We don't know if the models are reused yet because the game hasn't been datamined. Also it could make a lot of sense that they were referring to the texture of the model.
>B-BUT GAMEFREAK IS STILL LAZY FOR NOT MAKING NEW 1000+ MODELS !!!Except that is a ridiculous demand for any company. There's no way Gamefreak could keep up adding so many mons each generation
>B-BUT WHAT ABOUT HOW THERE'S NO NEW ANIMATIONS There are. The dynanax mons have new animations, the pokemon are much more expressive in the camping minigame and the new mons are new Animations
>W-WELL THAT'S NOT ENOUGH FOR MEWe weren't talking about your high demands. Just if there were new animations.
>B-BUT I CAN'T CATCH THEM ALL!!!You can...in pokemon home.
>I DONT WANT TO PAY FOR THIS SERVICE Who said Home costs money? Do you have information no one else does?
>BUT YOU'RE DEMANDING LESS CONTENT!!No I am not. I am asking for quality content rather than just cramming the games with 6 million mons for no reason. For no one cared about the amount of mons in games before, why does it matter now?
>B-BUT EVERY POKEMON IS SOMEONE'S FAVORITE Yes, but everyone also has favorites within the 500+ mons in the games
>STOP SHILLING!!!I'm not shilling. I'm just trying to have a decent hype season.
>CONSUME PRODUCT A GET EXCITED FOR NEXT PRODUCT Who said I was buying the game? I just think it's ridiculous to assume the game will be bad based off things that barely matter.
>WAIT FOR WHAT?!?! I CAN SEE IT'S SHITExcept you don't as there's been almost nothing shown about the games that have been seen as negative before (no proof of handholding, low postgame and region linearity for example). Not to mention there is almost no repercussions for waiting before final judgment.
>*posts more misleading pictures and screams shill*Okay. Nice talk.
