>>57012427Thank you so much!
>The vagueness of whether any of these big stories really happened keep it balanced and full of nuance.I'm glad I was able to do that in a way that separates itself from
"canonicity" because the last time I brought that up when preparing to write The Long Sleep, it derailed the entire thread.
No one wants to step on toes OR figure out how to gather the opinions of so many people to decide what happened or not.
>I especially like Jangles as a concept. It's the perfect role for a Klefki.>Some of her dialogue felt sort of clunky and too expositoryI have no experience with creative writing, that I recall. Any writing I've done was basic short stories for D&D characters or game world ideas I wanted to do, and they were all spread out over the last 10 years.
Roleplaying in a D&D session turned out to be a lot different than being the omniscient figure dictating events in a story and how they're articulated, so I think some of my dialogue may come off as "artificial" for the time being until I figure out a consistent method for naturally writing characters.
As for the content of the exposition, I feel like it had to be done as seemingly (after a once-over of the CG Rentry) neither of these Pokemon have been written about for Clover Guild yet, and I wanted to tackle a man-made Pokemon with Golett.
I intentionally left out
Regieleki and Regidrago, because I haven't played Gen 8, and us, as fans/players of the PMD games haven't seen them in any continent yet (cope), so I felt no reason to include them. Implying they'll ever be relevant, but I want to refrain from pulling the legendary card again in future writing, if I can.>Golett is hard to drawunlucky o7
Though I have faith you'll do him justice
I'm considering drawing stuff for Golett/Jangles because the internet's focus is on Golurk, but I make no promises 