>>33000215We're not talking generally about strength between species, we're talking specifically about strength and sexual dimorphism in the same species where one gender is substantially larger than the other -- this entire conversation began with the claim, "Men are stronger than women. The same applies to Pokemon," which is a retarded generalization, because it assumes other animals follow the same pattern of sexual dimorphism as humans, which is not often the case in species of fish, insect, reptile, etc. In many of these species, the female is notably larger and stronger than the male, and reasonably, we'd expect this to carry over to, say, piscine, arthropodic, or reptilian Pokemon.
We were never comparing lions and cows, you total goober, we were talking about sexual dimorphism in the same species.
