>>41324357I'm not saying he's infallible, but he's definitely a lot more credible than a random Japanese tweet of a blue screened switch and some Anon randomly typing a detailed explaination for why the blue screen occure. And then when asked for source, they sure a SciresM tweet that only explains what blue screens are, with no indication of SwSh utilizing NAND for vm.
We have no proof any of this shit mentioned in this thread is how SwSh handles NAND. Just a bunch of reactions piling atop a random post. I'm all for shitting in GF, but spreading misinformation for the sake of creating an uproar just makes the legitimate issues seem like a joke.
Wait until we get any confirmation from sources that are actually credible. Not a single source (even outside of SciresM) that has credibility and has been autistically scanning through the game's code has even so much as whispered the idea being spread in this thread. I feel it's have been a much larger shit storm the moment anyone got hold of that info.
Let's be cautious. Creating false shitstorms just makes noise that distracts from shit GF really needs to focus on.
