>>39546620>Are they cavemen?Cavewoman to be exact.
Same cliche bone adornments from cartoon cavewomen.
>>39546645I don't like the ones from gen 1 either. I'm not bias.
If you take a look here
>>39546260 all the Pokemon I like look like they would have very simplistic animal/insect thought processes, or not even thought processes actually, they straight up look like they act purely on instinct as actual animals and insects do.
I can imagine Victreebels just doing what actual pitcher plants do except as a more monsterous 'fantasy' variant for example.
Not that there's anything wrong with people who do like humanistic characteristics in their Pokemon, this is just all opinion remember. I don't like that shit though.
