>>57126986>That doesn't make any sense to me.That's because you're either trying on purpose to not understand, or you're trying to "win"
>How can a card be good just because its stats are mathematically balanced well?I didn't say this. I didn't say anything like this. Wiggly is good because you can randomly win games off conflips and it takes a decent hit (and Jiggly can stall games with coinflips as well)
>If there isn't a single game in the deck that benefits from running Wiggly vs some other card, then the card is not balanced well because all those other cards are balanced higherMew EX is very good. Is this what you're saying in a very obtuse way? If so, I agree with you, because that's what I'm saying too.
>I can't see how you can call a card good but then also acknowledge that there exists ZERO decks in the game that want to run that card vs something else.Now you're saying something entirely different than the rest of your post was. I'm not even saying "that there are ZERO decks in the game that want to run" Wiggly, I'm just saying that Mew EX is a god tier card, it's a god tier splash card, and it is what most likely took the place of Wiggly in the decks where Wiggly was being played. Pic related is a list that placed a few days ago, and it ran Wiggly, though it might be better with Mew EX instead for a double Koga effect. Because Mew EX is busted.
If you can't understand this, then you're purposely attempting not to.
