>>55512828>what the fuck is the point if it looks like shit visually?They don't look like shit, you just hate them because you can't handle that they look too similar to their origjnal forms for your liking
>can't be, i'm not the one who is relentlessly defending mega evolutionsNo, you're just the retard sperging out about something you don't understand
>i already explained this in an earlier postImagine thinking you've explained anything. Absolutely delusional
>the thing is, cross gen evos from the 2D era never felt they had a limit on how many changes they could could make to theoriginal mon.That's not true at all. While some cross gen evolutions do vary greatly from their original forms, they are actually in the minority. Most cross-gen evolutions/pre-evolutions tend to stick rather closely to their original counterpart's design:
>Pichu, Igglybuff, Cleffa, Azurill, Wynaut, Mantyke, Bonsly, Budew, Chingling, Happiny and others are just their base designs but smaller and with slightly less detail>Steelix, Kingdra, Porygon2, Blissey, Yanmega, Tangrowth, Weavile, Magmortar, Electivire, Rhyperior, Ambipom, Lickilicky, Gliscor and others are just the same base design only slightly bigger and with a few added details>megas don't do this. they're FORCED to look too similar to the original and that's badSo you'd agree that cross-gen evolutions are bad too then, yes? Because a lot of them follow the same design philosophy as Megas, which you consider lazy and uninspired, so surely you'd agree that cross-gen evolutions aren't much better conceptually and are mostly born of Game Freak's laziness as well. You won't, of course, because then you'd have to confront just how retarded and autistic your argument is
>i WILL complain about my favorite mons only getting buffed through ugly megasAnd I'll continue to laugh at you as I continue to enjoy my nice, cool Megas that are set to return in Pokemon Legends: Z-A
Again, cry more faggot
