>>53538201>The only "issue" is how the paradox mon were in the pastAnd how Heath could describe a Mirai/Koraidon
Or how there were never any remains of any of these Pokemon if they were ever in Area Zero
>Saying heath lied in itself raises a ton of questionsQuestions that are answered significantly more concisely than saying the time machine messed up to fix a non-existent time loop.
> specifically why he would need toBecause he never finds the fabled treasure of area zero, only the tera crystals humans couldn't use yet, a tablet they couldn't excavate, and crop circles, despite this being a majorly funded expedition.
>and the paradox pokemon were the least interesting part of the bookNot to Heath, who saw fit to put the Raidon on the literal cover of the book, we also know the book describes every Paradox mon at length which means they took up a sizable chunk.
Explain to me how Heath deciding the book wasn't 'exciting' enough before making up fakemons, including a 'mega evolution' of his bromon Cyclizar is somehow less realistic than the time machine performing functions never stated to fix a time loop never stated by the AI who was against the time machine in the first place but also gave heath not only the blueprints for the time machine (that were never confirmed to be blueprints, as we can't read them) but also information on every single paradox mon and also showed off paradox mons that they physically could not have had.
Why is one raising questions okay but the other raising much less convoluted questions not okay?
