>>46031189>Fakemon is based on a pun in a specific language and isn't even a good design but any criticism is met with "you don't get it"That indeed is dumb.
>Fakedex has every single unused type combination and is almost entirely dual type, with many second types just being forced for the sake of not having a monotypeAfter GF forcing monotypes on so many mons, I'm completely fine with this.
>Fakemon have new abilities that are absurdly broken and would destroy the gameImplying that's not what we had for the last few official generations, especially seen in gen VII, but still a good point. As long as ability is fun, unique, but still balanced I aproove it. And even if it's game breaking, like having Contrary during playthrough, it can make said playthrough for some.
>Fakedex introduces a new typeDepends on how it's introduced. Almost nothing can be worse than how GF introduced Fairy-type so now people expect the worst.
>Fakedex has a disproportionately high number of fursuits/objectmons/literally just animalsAbsolutely fair point. Again, you've gotta balance this shit and I wish more creators realized this.
I just want to see some creativity and variation. But fair criticism is even more important, as long as it's just not buzzwords.
