>>55507527>notice how all megas, like the one you posted right now, just slap a bunch of shit haphazardly all over older pokemonFirstly, it's not haphazard, there's a clear reason as to why each design is changed for each Mega. I've already shown how this is true with Mega Kangaskhan and Mega Metagross, clearly you just ignored that
Second, do you expect each design for an alternate form of an existing Pokemon to be so wildly different as to be unrecognizable from its base form, when the entire point of Mega Evolutions is to be an evolution of their original designs?
>the rare times in which a new one is good still beats all mega evolutions, regional variants, paradox mons, gigantamax mons, and convergent evolutionsExamples?
>none of the mons in gen 5 look anything like older mons. how are they replacing them?They fit the exact same niche that their originals did, thus being unoriginal in concept. Didn't think I had to explain this to you, but I guess I did
>that's because megas are one of the worst things that ever happened to this seriesWhich you still haven't proven, by the way. Not that you could, since your reason for saying their shit simply boils down to "I don't like them" over and over. You'd probably be taken more seriously if you just said that rather than trying and failing to assert that they're objectively badly designed
