>>39100972>Teary eyed unova tranny trying to downplay the fact that his dex looks like absolute shit to anybody who is mentally mature>>39100974>you have the trend in Alola and Kalos being towards creatures based on very few referencesNot a bad thing. Going back to having Pokemon be based on animals with very clear cut design features was nothing but an improvement over
>it's ice cream>it's a judo man but he's colored red>it's an alien but then we ruined the concept by changing its evo to look like a guy in a jacket>it's a swan but it looks gay>it's a clown builder>it's a bunch of ugly as fuck monkey recolors>it's a bunch of ugly genie recolors>it's a bear with snot dripping down from its nose but it's frozen>it's a vulture wearing a fucking diaperJesus christ imagine prefering that sort of garbage over the refined and focused things we have in the likes of Kalos.
>Let's make a Lobster but we'll put extra emphesis on its key feature, the claw, by making it large and having it sort of resemble a dragon head>low amounts of drawn in detailCompared to what? Unova? Objectively false. Kalos went back to having near Kanto level of detail on the majority of its Pokemon.
>and went so far as to introduce blatant objectmons that do not even pretense toward being creatures.More bullshit.
How is a set of gears with no discernable living features not the epitome of what you've just said?
